Howler of the Month (archive)
"This group [ISIS] does not emerge out of a sudden Islamic tendency for beheading. . . . Some of this intense fetish for violence is coming from the leaks of torture that are coming out of Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. Some of it is coming out of Hollywood, particularly the images of violence against Iraqi bodies [American Sniper]."
Sherene Seikaly, an assistant professor in modern Middle East history at the University of California, Santa Barbara, at a UCSB talk titled, "ISIS: A Historical Perspective"; The Bottom Line, May 27, 2015. (link to source)
We Couldn't Have Said it Better (archive)
"[I]n the Western social sciences, there's a holy trinity that tries to explain all social phenomena through the lens of one of three analytical categories: race, class, and gender. . . . And I often see many colleagues who want to push very hard against the idea that ISIS is a religious movement or that Islam has anything to do with the Islamic State. . . . [I]f you look at the cultural production, the intellectual production, the legal and theological production of ISIS, which is plentiful on the Web, there is no question that this is a movement that's drawing on a very particular strain or trend within the Islamic intellectual history, legal history, theological history."
Bernard Haykel, professor of Near Eastern studies and director of the Institute for Transregional Study of the Contemporary Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia at Princeton University, speaking at the Ethics & Public Policy Center's May 2015 Faith Angle Forum; "The Islamic State: Understanding its Ideology and Theology," May 3-5, 2015. (link to source)
CAMPUS WATCH, a project of the Middle East Forum, reviews and critiques Middle East studies in North America with an aim to improving them. The project mainly addresses five problems: analytical failures, the mixing of politics with scholarship, intolerance of alternative views, apologetics, and the abuse of power over students. Campus Watch fully respects the freedom of speech of those it debates while insisting on its own freedom to comment on their words and deeds.
The Latest on Campus
An Example of Juan Cole's "Informed" Scholarship
June 28, 2015 - Fousesquawk Blog
Should the University of California Adopt the State Department Definition of Anti-Semitism? [incl. Mark LeVine]
June 25, 2015 - Fousesquawk Blog
Summit Addresses Political, Cultural Changes in International Communities [incl. Paula Rayman]
June 24, 2015 - News of UMass Lowell
Israel-Hating Professor Hired to Teach Class on Israel at University of Missouri [incl. Sherene Seikaly, Adam Sabra, Steven Salaita]
June 24, 2015 - Observer.com
Academic Vulgarity Highlighted [incl. Mark LeVine, Reza Aslan, Juan Cole, Steven Salaita]
June 23, 2015 - Fousesquawk Blog
Study Abroad Teaches Understanding
June 23, 2015 - Superior Telegram
Bonfire of the Vulgarians: Middle East Studies in Decline
June 22, 2015 - American Thinker
A Year After His Death, Fouad Ajami's Detractors Look Worse than Ever
June 22, 2015 - FrontPage Magazine
Professor Cries McCarthyism Over Critical Article [on Jonathan Judaken]
June 20, 2015 - Fousesquawk Blog
Salaita Wins Suit for 9,000 Emails; University Censured for Rights Violations
June 19, 2015 - Indian Country Today Media Network
By Cinnamon Stillwell | Sat, 27 Jun 2015, 3:11 PM | Permalink
As if to drive home the point CW made recently in the quote-filled article "Bonfire of the Vulgarians: Middle East Studies in Decline," UC Irvine history professor Mark LeVine—whose profanity-laden Facebook call to "dismantle" Israel featured prominently in our round-up—has accompanied a new post on his Facebook page with this brilliant analysis: "F— the occupation. 50 years is enough."
Elsewhere, LeVine, who can't stop posting ill-advised, unedited commentary anywhere and everywhere on the Internet, left a rambling, op-ed length comment for a Jewish Journal op-ed on whether or not the University of California Board of Regents should adopt the U.S. State Department's definition of anti-Semitism. LeVine was not placated by the author's reticence on the matter and concludes his rant with the type of eliminationist rhetoric—couched in platitudes about "Judaism," "human rights," and "democracy"—for which he's become known:
[T]he vast majority of supporters of BDS [Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions], including the rapidly growing number of Jewish and Israeli supporters, oppose not merely Israeli policy but the Isareli [sic] state as its [sic] presently conceived of and acts--as an ethnocratic, exclusivist state built upon decades of occupation and no willingness to relinquish these claims.
I want to "undo the events of 1948," but not because I hate Israel or am anti-Semitic. Rather, it's because I stay true to the Prophetic Judaism that has always been the core of my identity and the ideals of human rights and democracy for all that they demand. There are many alternatives to the present Israeli political system--confederation, parallel states, binationalism. Advocating for them, and even for the end of a Zionist state cannot be equated with anti-Semitism.
We'll leave it to LeVine to decide if his single-minded obsession with the world's sole Jewish state or his tunnel vision regarding alleged human rights abuses constitutes anti-Semitism. But one thing's for sure: he needs to get help with impulse control vis-à-vis the Internet. Online anger management counselors are standing by. . . .
By Cinnamon Stillwell | Mon, 22 Jun 2015, 1:15 PM | Permalink
Earlier this year, a firestorm erupted when Connecticut College philosophy professor Andrew Pessin's 2014 Facebook comments, in which he compared Hamas in Gaza to a "wild pit bull . . . chained in a cage, regularly making mass efforts to escape," were deemed "racist" and "dehumanizing" by student activists, colleagues, and administrators alike. Meanwhile, Middle East studies academics regularly emit commentary that is unambiguous in its bigotry, tastelessness, and vulgarity, to nary a peep. Not coincidentally, the vitriol is directed at targets academe finds politically unpopular: Israel, pro-Israel Jews, and anti-Islamists. In the latest Campus Watch research, appearing today at American Thinker, CW West Coast representative Cinnamon Stillwell take a look at the worst of the worst:
A glaring example occurred in late 2014, when UC Irvine history professor Mark LeVine posted an expletive-laden, unhinged rant on Facebook calling for the destruction of Israel. . . . In this age of selective campus hypersensitivity, it's difficult to imagine correspondingly genocidal language being directed at any other country. Given that he's the authorof Heavy Metal Islam, LeVine's juvenile language might be chalked up to his rock 'n' roll persona, but it is hardly befitting the temperament of a scholar.
To read the entire article, please click here.
By Winfield Myers | Mon, 22 Jun 2015, 9:16 AM | Permalink
Lebanese-born Middle East studies scholar Fouad Ajami died one year ago today. At the time of his death, his lemming-like detractors attacked him, viciously at times, for his refusal to ape their cultural relativism and biased scholarship. Today at FrontPage Magazine, CW director Winfield Myers critiques the critics and finds them boorish and intellectually parochial:
"He came with conceptions, but he made a voyage of discovery. And so he caught truths, deeper and more durable truths about himself and about us all." (The Traveler's Luck)
So wrote Fouad Ajami, who died one year ago today, about Joseph Conrad, whose talents for capturing the clash between East and West he judged superior to V.S. Naipaul's. He might have been writing about his own gift for interpreting the Middle East from his adopted American home. The truths he caught were gained (like Conrad's) through an immigrant's eyes—eyes trained not just on his adopted country, but on the land of his birth.
To read the rest of this essay, please click here.
By Winfield Myers | Tue, 16 Jun 2015, 9:21 PM | Permalink
Jonathan Judaken, a history professor at Rhodes College, has penned a histrionic attack on Campus Watch (CW) for the website Inside Higher Ed blaming CW for a published report on a recent lecture he delivered at the University of Rochester. Among Judaken's numerous errors, one stands out: Campus Watch had nothing to do with the article that gave him the vapors.
Don't you hate it when that happens?
The report, by Rochester Institute of Technology English lecturer A.J. Caschetta, appeared first at Jihad Watch and then at the Middle East Forum, of which CW is indeed a project. But as anyone familiar with think tanks should know, articles appearing on one site do not denote sponsorship by another. It's a bit like saying, or, given the tenor of Judaken's piece, screaming while rending one's garment, that Rhodes College has attacked CW because of the ill-informed actions of a single professor.
Continue to full text of posting...
Campus Watch Blog Archive