Middle East studies in the News
Release That Tape [incl. Rashid Khalidi]
by Eric Fingerhut
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
November 2, 2008
The National Council for Young Israel has jumped into the Rashid Khalidi fray, urging the Los Angeles Times to release its tape of the farewell party for the Columbia University professor which Obama atttende.
NCYI president Shlomo Z. Mostofsky writes that the paper is "hypocritically hiding behind a promise to a source and withholding information from the public that could affect the outcome of next week's presidential election." Here's the full letter:
Note: Articles listed under "Middle East studies in the News" provide information on current developments concerning Middle East studies on North American campuses. These reports do not necessarily reflect the views of Campus Watch and do not necessarily correspond to Campus Watch's critique.
October 31, 2008
Los Angeles Times
To the Editor
The election of the President of the United States and the peaceful transition of power from one president to the next is the hallmark of America's constitutional democracy. The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the freedom of the press, another hallmark of our democracy. It is, therefore, most disturbing that your paper is hypocritically hiding behind a promise to a source and withholding information from the public that could affect the outcome of next week's presidential election.
Senator Barak Obama became the Democratic candidate for President, despite his affiliation with Reverend Jeremiah Wright. The Senator's repudiation of his pastor was accepted by Americans who believed the assurances of this charismatic candidate.
The Times is in possession of a tape of a 2003 event that Senator Obama attended with Palestinian scholar Rashid Khalidi. The Times is refusing to allow the pubic to review the tape claiming that they promised anonymity to the source who provided them with the tape. Steve Barry, writing in your paper on March 24, 1998, criticized the secret settlement of civil court proceedings because they often hide issues that are "immensely important to the public." Tresa Baldas in the National Law Journal of September 15, 2005, quoted Susan Seager, an attorney representing a number of media outlets, including the LA Times, who did not want the court records sealed in the case of Armour v Ritter. Ms. Seager said : "When courts conduct private proceedings behind closed doors, it creates public mistrust and suspicion."
In an August 29, 2003, interview with Joe Scarborough, Mr.Khalidi hedged when Mr. Scarborough asked him if he said "Israel is a ‘racist' state with an ‘apartheid' system and that America has been brainwashed by Israel." The transcript of that broadcast provided the actual cite for Mr. Khalidi's statement.. (Jordan Elgrably, "Crisis of Our Times: Nationalism Identity and the Future of Israel/Palestine, an Interview with Rashid Khalidi.")
Your paper claims that the outcome of civil court proceedings is "immensely important to the public" and that "private court proceedings create public mistrust and suspicion." These positions are ludicrous in light of your intentionally withholding information of grave concern to members of the public. Surely the outcomes of civil court proceedings pale in comparison to the importance of a presidential election. Your failure to publicize the video "creates mistrust and suspicion" among Jewish and pro-Israel voters as to Senator Obama's record, especially when so many voters are undecided about the election. "The public has the right to know."
Shlomo Z. Mostofsky, President
National Council of Young Israel
receive the latest by email: subscribe to campus watch's free mailing list